2 Comments
User's avatar
Views From My Cab's avatar

The legal obligation to 2050 smacks to me of unconstitutional bullshit. No Parliament can bind a future one, much as the apparatchiks might wish to. Quite how one establishes that I don't (yet) know. Once I've found out I post something.

Expand full comment
Andrew Marsh's avatar

Well, once again, a powerful article. Thank you Patrick.

I think Dame T May's legal obligation to 2050 needs to be removed, and quickly.

This is causing immense and needless harm.

While 'son of a tool' Starmer remains in some sort of denial bubble, the UK economy is burning to the ground. Rachel from Accounts has no idea about anything, ever.

Multi-culti, plucky Ukriane, Theee NHS, Theee Science, Wendy House politics, activist lawyers, activist PoPo - none of this matters compared to getting out of the immense policy failure imposed by politicians after 40 years of meddling.

This is a lasting epitaph to 'PPE' degree equipped blusterers - the truly unprofessional.

It will take decades before this is forgotten.

So, no time to waste.

With or without Layzee Laybour, things must change. Now.

Expand full comment